3/10/2013

Chizuko’s Blog No.41


February 2nd, 2013

There ARE “People Who Will Not Let Nuclear Plants Be Built”



I’m writing book reviews for Kumamoto Nichinichi Shimbun (Kumamoto Daily News). This time I’m introducing a new book by Shin Yamaaki, who is the chief of W-WAN, a subgroup of WAN, and also a planning member of the Nuclear Free Now conference held in Tokyo and Koriyama at the end of 2012. At the conference she co-organized the “Make Your Everyday Ambiguous Dissatisfaction into Political Issues” project with Greenpeace.





 “People Who Will Not Let Nuclear Plants Be Built
--- From Iwaishima To the Future ---“
Written by Shin Yamaaki
(Iwanami Shoten, 21/12/2012)




Book Review: “People Who Will Not Let Nuclear Plants Be Built”

30 Years since the Building Plan --- A Document of Resistance of Iwaishima


I knew that there were 54 nuclear plants in Japan. Since the first plant was built in Tokaimura village, Japan’s nuclear plants have increased at a pace of two plants a year, but their actual building sites are limited to the 17 places that were chosen in the 1970s. In the other 30 places which the authorities picked out as potential locations after that period, no nuclear plants have ever been built. The reason is because the local people resisted and held out. This is what I learned from reading this book. I also learned why there are places like Fukushima and Tsuruga, where a string of plants are located and therefore called “Genpatsu [=Nuke] Ginza,” and how the government’s grant system works -- one more plant means one more pile of subsidy money and the locals tend to get addicted to it. All these revelations opened my eyes to the reality.

The author Yamaaki is a freelance writer, who wrote the book “A Test of Local Autonomy -- 13 Years in a Proxy War Against Nuclear Power for the Citizens of Suzu City, Noto Peninsula,” (Katsura Shobo)  [Buy this book: jump to an Amazon page] In this book Yamaaki closely covers the protest campaigns of the Suzu citizens who refused to allow the building of a nuclear power plant. She was awarded the Matsui Yayori Journalist Award and the Arai Namiko Award for the book.

On Noto Peninsula there is a nuclear plant in Shika Town, but not in Suzu City. On Kii Peninsula, Japan’s largest peninsula, which is located centrally, there are none. This is because people there refused to accept the plant building plans in Wakayama and Mie Prefectures. You can read the details in the book  “A Record of the Continued Refusal of Wakayama to Allow a Nuclear Power Plant” (Jurousha).  [Buy this book: jump to an Amazon page]   There sure were people who chose not to live with nuclear plants. Can we claim innocence for ourselves just by saying, “We were tricked,” or, “We believed in the state”?

Yamaaki’s latest book consists of reports from the island of Iwaishima, which had been the biggest nuclear issue up until 3/11, the Great East Japan Earthquake. This book documents 30 years of resistance since a plan emerged to build a nuclear plant in Tanoura of Kaminoseki Town located on the opposite shore, just 4 kilometers from Iwaishima. Instinct told the islanders that there must be something behind it, when the authorities say, "We’ll give you money to let us build a plant." And they were right. Yamaaki quotes the words of the late Masahiro Tachibana, a Buddhist monk in Tsuruga City, who said “Five, or perhaps 10 more years of resistance will force the plant plan to financial ruin. Hold on 10 more years.” Yes, there was financial ruin, but at too big a cost with the Fukushima disaster.

Yamaaki vividly presents the voices of the men and women of Iwaishima in her chronological document. The most powerful were those of the obachan [=elderly women]. They said, “We put men aside. Women are stronger --- that was what we noticed once we started [the campaign].” The battle against nuclear plants is one against money. In the process of all those conciliatory approaches by Chugoku Electric Power, Iwaishima Fisheries Cooperative Association refused to take the compensation of 1.1 billion yen for fisheries, the kind of money which the other fishery associations accepted. What helped them stick to their position to the end was also the power of the obachan, who said “Anybody who’s got money won’t be able to speak freely.“ When you accept the money, you are selling out the sea. A fisherman said, “The sea doesn’t belong to somebody. This is everybody’s sea. So all of us have to protect it.”

Chugoku Electric Power got the ball rolling in the name of research in 2005, and “began” landfill works in 2009. The situation became tense, and signaled the beginning of the battle on the land and at sea. Sit-in demonstrations, protests by fishing boats, actions by kayak troops, and so on. What happened in February 2011 was almost a naval combat. Yamaaki’s skillful pen reports the scenes as if it were exciting live coverage. Even during the dangerous sea campaign there were no casualties, probably thanks to the locals’ masterly seamanship, which has been a tradition of the islanders since the Middle Ages. The Iwaishima islanders are a proud people who do not take orders.

The once suspended plan of the Kaminoseki plants, due to the Fukushima accident, is now in an unpredictable situation following the change of administration. How huge a price does this country need to pay to learn its lesson?

---------------------------------------------------------------------

(appeared first in Kumamoto Nichinichi Shimbun, January 6, 2013)

Translated by A. Tawara

3/06/2013

DVD Preview: Hollywood and Asian Women


phot_asian
Hollywood and Asian Women
Elaine Kim, Dir. 2011. America. 
30 minutes. Japanese subtitles.


Pandora Films & Books runs a preview of Hollywood and Asian Women, a DVD course material perfect for gender studies and ethnic studies classes.

Date: Tuesday, March 26
Time: Doors open at 15:00. Screening starts at 15:15.
Program: Screening is from 15:15 to 15:45, followed by a talk session by Professor Fukuko Kobayashi (Waseda University).
Admission: Free
How to apply: Send an email by March 15 including your name, affiliation, phone, fax, email and the number of attendees, to pandora @pan-dora.co.jp.
* Up to three people per institution are admitted.
* Seats are limited to 50 and will be assigned by lot if oversubscribed.


Hollywood and Asian Women is designed as a university-level course material that explores how American media portray Asians and Asian Americans. What has changed and what has not? What hope is left? The director, Elaine Kim, teaches at the Department of Asian American Studies, University of California at Berkeley. 



Original Article on WAN Website (February 26, 2013)
Translated and Adapted by Aya Kitamura

3/03/2013

"Imposing Words": Embroideries by Ruri Clarkson

Needlework has long been perceived as women's work. "Imposing Words: Contemporary Family Matters" by Ruri Clarkson exhibits embroidery works that sew together contemporary women's voices. The exhibition takes place from March 14 to 20, 2013, at Nidi Gallery (free admission). 

Ⓒクラークソン瑠璃 2013
(C) Ruri Clarkson 2013



















From Press Release:

Ruri Clarkson will present her new work “IMPOSING WORDS: Contemporary family matters” at Nidi gallery.  Her exhibition will highlight discordant keywords of contemporary Japanese family by using embroidery, a method closely associated with women. 「負け犬」 (makeinu), which literally translates to “loser dog” but refers to single woman without partner, and 「婚活」 (konkatsu), which means marriage hunt, are just few of the words that get passed around by the media to spotlight the shift in domestic structure in contemporary Japan.  These words impose themselves on Japanese women with their overloaded meanings, blurring the separation between the “ideal self” in the eyes of society and the “true self” which is unaffected by society.

Adorning each imposing words with wordplay inspired motifs, by the task of sewing, Clarkson examines and questions the usage of these words and their impact on women’s lives.  The venue will be set up as a “home”, with laundry lines running from wall to wall with artworks hanging from them.  In this “home” the audience are invited to feel the doily shaped artworks with their hands to readjust the distance they have between the imposing word and themselves.

Information 
Venue:       Nidi gallery, Tokyo Shibuya-ku Sakuragaokacho 9-17  TOC3 Suite 408 
Hours:       12:00-20:00 
Workshop: Embroidering handkerchief      Sunday  March 17th  All day 
* [WHY WHY WHY] zine (limited 500 print) and Imposing Words badges will be on sale. 
* Samples of Clarkson’s illustration works and fashion works will be shown at the venue. 

 クラークソン
Biography
Ruri Clarkson is a nomad, nurtured by 4 countries.  In 2009 she started creating artworks which led to illustrating for clients, as well as exhibiting in galleries and alternative spaces in Tokyo and Hong Kong.  In 2011, Home a zine masquerading as a “guide” to homemaking, was featured in Tokyo Art Book fair’s Feminine artist's publication.  In WHY WHY WHY, her recent zine, she expands her work to include manga, photography and writing, venturing into multidisciplinary communication with her audience.  Ruri is a student at AIT(Arts Initiative Tokyo) and a graduate of Department of Environmental Information at Keio University. Winner of 2012 Isetan WAM award, 2011 The Choice award. 




Posted by Aya Kitamura

2/26/2013

A Society Where We Can Turn “Disability” into “Individuality”


  Some people say “Disability is individuality.” The word sounds very pretty, but I feel it simplifies the problems too much when it’s used by people who don’t know much about the disabled. Those who are called “the disabled” are “handicapped,” at least, in some ways. But they don’t handicap themselves; rather, it’s their circumstances that handicap them. People with myopia, for example, would have great difficulty in their social life without aids such as glasses (at least I would). We can lead “normal” lives only because we have glasses or contact lenses, but without such aids, we are “the disabled.” We can consider our faces with glasses on as our individualities. But if we didn’t have such aids, we couldn’t accept the idea that “Your bad sight is your individuality.” What’s important is a society where we can turn “disability” into “individuality.”

  By the way, when does it hit parents that their children might have developmental disability? I thought that was the case soon after my daughter was born. I thought that she was somehow different from other children. Although she was my first child, I couldn’t repress my intuition that was telling me something was wrong. My new-born daughter slept well, and all I had to do was change her diapers and give her milk. She needed almost no care other than that.

 “Something’s wrong with my daughter. She needs almost no care and it seems that she doesn’t catch my eye.”
  I told my family and friends this, but they didn’t take my words seriously. My mother-in-law told me it wasn't right to complain that my daughter didn’t need care, and my mother said that it was information I'd read online that was making me think that she might have developmental disability (in fact, the Internet didn’t help me so much). Searching online for “developmental disability” and “autism,” I found a number of people asking if their children had autism. And, the usual answers read, “It’s OK. You’re just worrying too much. I know a child like yours in my neighborhood,” or “My son acted in the same way, but he doesn’t have autism. So, it’s gonna be alright.” I felt uncomfortable at such answers because they treated the question as “somebody else’s problem.”

  You can’t say it’s OK when you don’t actually see the child. What do they have in mind when they make irresponsible comments such as, “You’re just worrying too much” or, “It’s OK”? If your friend told you she had some symptoms that could be signs of cancer, you’d tell her to go to the hospital and have a checkup. If she did actually have cancer, how would you take responsibility if you'd told her, “It’s OK! I know a person who had symptoms like yours, but she didn’t have cancer! You’re just worrying too much!”? What you really have to say is, “If you’re concerned about your symptoms, consult with the hospital or some medical institution.” No one likes to do the job of telling someone a shocking truth. Genuine kindness, however, is to help people to face the truth and come to terms with it gradually.

  “Your daughter is still too young to be diagnosed and I’m not a doctor, but as far as I can see, she looks fine,” staff at the Developmental Disability Support Center told me. It did nothing but reassure me, but the reassurance to help me in a desperate situation and the one to divert me from the truth are two completely different things. The latter is clearly harmful, and I find it irresponsible complacence. Of course, I know it's well-intentioned, though.

  My daughter did eventually manage to start catching my eye and pointing at the people and things around her, but later than most other children. But I still worried that she might have developmental disability. I had heard that some autistic children had unstable development and suddenly went backwards. All these years raising my daughter, I’d never felt that she was cute with all my heart. I was always wondering what would become of her and I couldn’t get it out of my mind. I really regret that I couldn’t enjoy raising her to my heart’s content.

  Irritated by my worries, my mother told me “You’ve got to raise your child no matter what problems she has!” I was surprised by her remark. I’m not saying I don’t want to raise my daughter just because she’s disabled. What I’m worrying about is her future -- what if her disability means she has to go through hard times? What if she can’t enjoy the expressive richness of books because her learning disability prevents her from reading? Of course, her disability doesn’t automatically mean she’s unhappy. Still, parents would wish to minimize the hardship their children would go through and develop their potential to its fullest.

Original article on the WAN website (October  4, 2012)



Translated from the WAN website by TAJIMA, N.

2/20/2013


A divorce by agreement is possible in mediation?
Reply by Attorney Ms. Sakura UCHIKOSHI

 

 

 

 
 
◎Although there is a method, it had better be positive.

Both the husband and the wife agree on divorce by mediation, however two persons or either one may desire a divorce by agreement as feeling resistance etc. and  submits a notification of  "divorce by mediation."

In each family register of the husband and the wife, it is indicated as "○ year○ month ○ day , divorce-by-agreement notification with ・・・" in the case of divorce by agreement, and also indicated as "○ year ○ month ○ day , divorce-by-mediation formation with ・・・"  in the case of divorce by mediation. The latter case, probably you will hesitate to mediate because an image of mediation is like your divorce was not formed with agreement or you and your husband disputed heavily.

In that case, both of you can sign up or put one’s seal on notification of divorce by agreement and submit it. If you take that way, you had better be cleared that both of you agree about the expense of bringing up a child, settlement of asset, reparation, division of pension on documents of mediation. On documents of mediation, it is written that both of you agree on divorce by agreement. But even though that agreement is written on the documents, divorce by agreement is not formed. You should write down who will submit a notification of divorce(conveniently it is usual that one who remove family register will submit) and one entrust a notification of divorce with one’s sign and seal to another who will submit it at mediation.

However, it is troublesome if one who does not submit a notification of divorce will submit an unuccepted report (notification of the purport that a divorce notice is not received). If one just forgot about an unaccepted report, you can ask to withdraw it. But if one does not withdraw it easily, you may be in a trouble. In that case, you have to start to proceed to offer mediation again.

 Considering the possibility of such a trouble, I would recommend to realize divorce through divorce by mediation.  I believe that divorce is divorce. It is the same a divorce resolved by mediation as a divorce resolved by agreement. I am sure that you make a new start by overcoming difficulties in either way (a lawsuit of divorce is also the same, you worked hard and resolved). You should not mind. I strongly recommend to take a certain way without taking risk.

I am not saying that divorce by agreement is better than divorce by mediation. But if either the husband or the wife is abroad on the day of a formation of divorce, you could form a divorce by agreement or form a divorce by mediation on the basis of representative attendance. If the husband or the wife is abroad, he/she had better sign up or put one’s seal on a notification of divorce in advance and hand it over to her/his representative for handing over to other parties. But if either one is away for a short business trip etc…, it is better to change the due date or assign another due date.  It is certain that the person himself/herself had better attend when mediation is formed including divorce case.

Otherwise, there is a way that the Family Court will hold hearing instead of mediation (Domestic-proceedings Article 284 the 1st clause of adjective law). This is the hearing by the referee performed by authority in consideration of all situations when the Family Court admits being considerable, it will decide, if the party concerned to an objection cannot be found within two weeks, and it has the same effect as an irrevocable judgment.   

 

Original article on the WAN website (February  21, 2013)


 

Translated and adapted from the WAN website by OGAWA.M.